Search for: "In Re: Edward C."
Results 61 - 80
of 741
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm
The case is In re: Apache Corp. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:59 am
If I understood them correctly, the reason is that somebody within the UPC wanted to re-invent the wheel and establish a completely new and complicated authentication system, because… why exactly? [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:01 am
Key Findings Carbon leakage occurs when a climate policy in one jurisdiction leads to emissions-producing activity simply shifting to a different jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:14 am
Attorneys Brian Lee Whisler, Jacob Kaplan and Robert Edward Duffy III of Baker McKenzie previously represented VUZ Bank. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Barlow, C. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
C. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Recall that a decade ago, in the wake of the Edward Snowden disclosures, Silicon Valley and Washington were very much on the outs with each other. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
Professor Steven C. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 6:35 pm
The 2022 Ig Nobel Prize for Literature has been awarded to Eric Martinez, Francis Mollica, and Edward Gibson, for their study of the reasons that legal documents are often so hard to read. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 5:54 am
Edward Hospital, 2012 IL 112898 The facts must have changed to return to an Illinois divorce court in order to get a modification of an order. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
C. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Posted by C. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Posted by C. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
The ”long” progressive era, to apply to Novak’s periodization a convention popularized by historian Rebecca Edwards, witnessed the creation of the “modern democratic state” (235), an achievement that—as Novak declares, in a characteristically exuberant rhetorical flourish—was “arguably” the “most significant legal-political development of the twentieth century” (2). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There are strong arguments that the narrow reading of Article 40.6.1(i) and the implication of an unenumerated right into Article 40.3.1 were unnecessary, and that all of the constitutional protections for freedom of speech should be (re-)integrated into Article 40.6.1(i) (see Tom Daly “Strengthening Irish Democracy: A Proposal to Restore Free Speech to Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution” (2009) 31 Dublin University Law Journal (ns) 228 (academia); Robert Noonan… [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm
Charkaoui, Re, 2007 SCC 9 at para. 53;Ruby v. [read post]
