Search for: "In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al" Results 61 - 80 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2007, 4:37 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.In re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Litigation, Astrzeneca AB, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Montana, et al.: Specific Jurisdiction’s Next Mile Marker (Nathaniel Fowler, Frost Brown Todd) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
Lenge et al. in oppositionBrief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in oppositionPetitioners' reply Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Council Tree Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am by Michelle Yeary
  Or, if knowing the largest pharmaceutical MDL to date is something you can use as an ice breaker. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:07 pm by Kelly
Supreme Court to take on patent settlement agreements: Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co et al v Bayer et al (FDA Law Blog) US: BIO joins 170 business, research institutions and organisations to urge caution in Microsoft v i4i case (PatentlyBIOtech) US: Galderma wins important victory in fight against Leo’s psoriasis patent covering vitamin D, corticosteroid composition for ‘dermal use’ (Reexamination Alert) US: Déjà vu! [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:19 pm by Marie Louise
Merck (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keppra (Levetiracetam) – US: Orange Book patent listing precipitates DJ action to trigger generic Keppra XR 180-day exclusivity forfeiture: Par Pharmaceutical v UCB et al (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) Naropin (Ropivacaine) – US: Judge O’Malley in dissent: Patent assignments should be a matter of state law: Abraxis BioScience v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Rachael Vaughn
Policy et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century (Stephen A. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Even if the plaintiffs’ lawyers funded a study, they can claim, with plausible deniability, that they funded the study in connection with another client’s case, not the client who is plaintiff in the case in which discovery is sought. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:12 am
Tele-Made, Inc., et al. (08/03/2007): appeal of summary judgment of noninfringement of the patent-in-suit (affirmed); discussion of patent related to wide and strong hospital beds (U.S. [read post]