Search for: "In Re Austin S. Et Al." Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am by Venkat
It's unclear there's adequate justification for requiring registration for these types of sites or services (even for those whom the data ostensibly says are likely to re-offend online). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:18 am by Don Cruse
WHITTINGTON, ET AL., No. 10-0316 KUT reports on the same case: “Whittington Loses (Again), But Says He’s Not Done” The Statesman also notes “Texas high court hands victory to Austin architect in liability case” about the petition denial in LOU ANN SMITH AND JIMMY JACKSON SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF RACHEL AND GRAYSON SMITH v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:50 pm by Wells Bennett
  There’s also the fact that the 9/11 case will be Guantanamo’s most consequential prosecution, and thus deliver a verdict on the re-tooled commission system. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Alan E. Sherman
Combs, et al., Cause Number D-1-GN-11-000947, in the Travis County District Court, and the service is web hosting which the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts treats as a taxable “data processing” service under Texas Tax Code Sections 151.0035 and 151.0101(a)(12). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:14 pm by Michael
It's scary, and it's a hard thing to think you’re a lawyer but you’re impoverished. [read post]