Search for: "In Re Breast Implant Litigation"
Results 61 - 80
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Fla. 2009) Silicone – Breast Implants Allison v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:05 am
Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation (Duron), 2007 WL 1725289 (D. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
We have seen litigation involving cancer, breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes, breast implants, severe mental illness and more. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 5:18 am
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation, 667 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 2003). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:20 pm
Notwithstanding the ongoing nature of the injuries allegedly attributable to silicone breast implants, the Supreme Court ruled in In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation, 667 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 2003) that the continuation of pain and suffering attributable to such implantations were attributable to a specific, identifiable event and therefore did not require inter-policy allocation. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
” Cardozo Law Review DeNovo 1, 14 (2009) (“[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 5:24 am
A company that manufactures breast implants and other devices filed a protest to the proposed mark registration, and so we'll all have to continue to do without.Even when designing packaging, you need to mindful of trademarks. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
So we’re on day 9 at the Cleveland Clinic, the only medical facility in the world where it’s actually a good think to say you’re at the Clinic. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:04 am
He's tried three cases since January 1, 2000: a damages-only retrial in a case over the value of a piece of African art; the Dow Corning tax litigation, over the appropriate tax treatment of costs incurred defending breast implant claims; and a product liability wrongful death case.It's a shame you can't see each other's reactions to that disclosure. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
(One reason Breast Implants and Bone Screws became mass torts is because the alleged injury was "pain. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
The original for this post is The Unintentional Message Of The “Worst” Drug And Device Court Opinions at Litigation & Trial. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
See In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
The court held that this kind of warning liabilty was too broad to be permitted:If I accept plaintiffs' argument, the law will be permitting recovery for a risk that the plaintiff assumed because the plaintiff might have made a different decision as a result of knowing of other risks for which the plaintiff did not experience any harm.In re Silicone Breast Implant Litigation, 64 D. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am
In re Breast Implant Cases, 942 F. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:59 pm
In re Silicone Gel Breast Implant Product Liability Litigation. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
See In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Prod. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (describing plaintiffs’ expert witnesses in silicone litigation as “charlatans”; “[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:48 pm
” Breast. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:37 pm
In the Breast Implant MDL, for example, Judge Pointer (the MDL transferee judge) did not appoint a Rule 706 expert scientific panel until after other judges (including Judge Weinstein) started pursuing that path. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
We have to admit that we’re scratching out heads about a recent decision out of Alabama that – contrary to everything else we’ve seen – concluded that the manufacturer of a branded drug could be liable in a case where it never sold the generic product that was all the plaintiff every took and thereby (allegedly) suffered injury.It’s not like this issue hasn’t been litigated before in Alabama.The first Alabama case we know of to consider the issue… [read post]
