Search for: "In Re Frederick P."
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 6:00 am
“McVeigh,” Toobin writes, “belonged to a thriving and enduring political movement in the United States” (p. 208), organized around both the belief in the malignity of the United States government and the overwhelming importance of guns (and the fear that the government would take away guns). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
In this equation P() is a function, not a constant. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Blix Street’s lead counsel, Bert Deixler, and the Cassidys’ lead counsel, Sun, as well as his co-counsel, Frederick Feldman, were present in court. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm
NWWashington, DC 20500Rochelle P. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Employment Law(RES) KF3464 .F738 2010Employment discrimination / Joel Wm. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
The SEC’s order finds that Morgan Stanley violated Rule 30(a) of Regulation S-P, also known as the “Safeguards Rule. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
As per In re: Signet Jewelers Limited Securities Litigation: [J]udicial approval of a class action settlement is a two-step process. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Jed Rubenfeld and William P. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
I often quote what I call “Roche’s dictum,” which I heard John P. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
See generally William P. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
@heldincontempt - Heather P, lawyer, mom, pop culture junkie. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
The Defendants, Frederick C. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:22 am
The case also merited a mention in the 1920 annual report of the “Police Force of the Dominion” (p. 5) that was presented to the New Zealand Parliament. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
Galen Greaser, New Guide to Spanish and Mexican Land Grants in South Texas, p. 4. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
' 36 American Criminal Law Review 87-116 (Winter 1999) at p. 91]. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 7:43 am
Charles P. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Re. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
We're talking about facts here. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
