Search for: "In Re Hy" Results 61 - 80 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
In sending the case back to the lower courts for re-examination, Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the majority, asked that courts consider “[W]hy, when the employer accommodated so many, could it not accommodate pregnant women as well? [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 3:30 am by Jack Bogdanski
On Friday he asked an interesting question:[W]hy aren’t Democratic cities in the West doing as well as Democratic cities in the East? [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:32 pm by David Lat
We’re just glad we no longer get (very many) envelopes full of white powder. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm by Gene Quinn
All you’re talking about is ­­ if I can use the word ­­ an “idea. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Steve Kalar
Id. at *2.In the rebuttal closing argument, the AUSA argued, “[W]hy don’t we send a memo to all drug traffickers, to all persons south of the border and in Imperial County and in California—why not our nation while we’re at it. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Ronald Mann
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg struck a similar note, asking, “[W]hy … shouldn’t it matter that these annotations are in no sense the law, they’re just useful information on how the law has been interpreted and applied by others? [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:35 am
‘[w]hy are you coming over here and saying where are you from? [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:10 am
The proper spelling is "look-alike" because it's meaningless to talk of "a-like" unless you're in the ha-bit of hy-phen-a-ting e-ver-y word ... [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
Tribune editorial board makes a similar argument: “[w]hy are cameras important? [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:42 am by Barry Barnett
    Associate:    "[W]hy do you treat us like imbeciles without a shred of common sense?" [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 9:03 am by Jourdan Day
In Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Ltd., the board restored its previous joint-employer standard, which requires evidence that the entities actually exercised joint control over essential employment terms. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:32 am by azatty
And yet human actions remind us that it is a lesson that must be re-learned over and over. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:12 pm
Sanchez, he argued, [W]hy don't we send a memo to all drug traffickers, to all persons south of the border and in Imperial County and in California--why not our nation while we're at it. [read post]
To avoid the prospect that a Democratic-controlled NLRB may one day simply overturn Hy-Brand and return to the Browning Ferris standard, the Republican-controlled Congress is moving legislation to amend the NLRA and enshrine the Hy-Brand standard. [read post]
To avoid the prospect that a Democratic-controlled NLRB may one day simply overturn Hy-Brand and return to the Browning Ferris standard, the Republican-controlled Congress is moving legislation to amend the NLRA and enshrine the Hy-Brand standard. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Lebowitz
” But amid allegations of conflicts of interest, the Board reversed itself and vacated the Hy-Brand decision in February 2018, which had the effect of re-establishing the Browning-Ferris “indirect control test” as the prevailing standard. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Lebowitz
” But amid allegations of conflicts of interest, the Board reversed itself and vacated the Hy-Brand decision in February 2018, which had the effect of re-establishing the Browning-Ferris “indirect control test” as the prevailing standard. [read post]