Search for: "In Re Interstate Power Co." Results 61 - 80 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
But this doesn’t mean that we’re including only violent crimes. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
While a substantial and complex body of case law has developed under RICO, the following are the main issues that bear on the viability of such a claim against the lawyers and medical professionals who are responsible for allegedly bogus claims, such as were seen in the Silica MDL: The existence of repeated instances of the misconduct on which the RICO claim is predicated; A showing that there has been a pattern or practice of such misconduct; Proof that a person has conducted the affairs of an… [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
Where grounds for recusal of trial judge would arise only during sentencing (if at all), defendant was not entitled to writ of mandamus ordering recusal from trial In Re: John Moore, 955 F.3d 384 (April 9, 2020). [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Once you're in the interstate commerce and [Congress] can regulate it, pretty much all bets are off . . . . [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
—reveal more of an individual's life and associations than does an ALPR trained on an interstate highway. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
This is the old problem of how to have decentralized regulation of what's in a state when there is interstate commerce and travel and the states all affect each other. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
A national lockdown would be an exercise of the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce—here temporarily halting both in the immediate hope of saving lives and ultimately reviving our economy. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am by Guest
White, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 700, 725 (1869), could co-exist with the idea that the federal government could exercise regulatory power over “every foot of American soil. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This was, of course, basically correct, though the dominant response, including that of the Court and especially after the New Deal, is “so what,” given the establishment of some “nexus” with interstate commerce, however tenuous. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in en banc news, the Fourth Circuit will not reconsider its holding that the feds' power to regulate interstate commerce permits them to prosecute a man who attacked a coworker out of anti-gay animus. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:31 pm by Jacob Schulz, William Ford
.: The House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Presidential Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Power. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 10:17 am
Co., 700 F.3d 585, 591 (1st Cir. 2012) ("Generally, final arbitral awards are afforded the same preclusive effects as are prior court judgments. [read post]