Search for: "In Re J. B" Results 61 - 80 of 4,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 6:01 am by David Vasella
Das BVerwGer bejaht das Vorliegen einer mittelbaren Verwechslungsgefahr zwischen der älteren Wortmarke "RED BULL" (für Spirituosen und Liköre) und der jüngeren Wortmarke "DANCING BULL" (für alkoholische Getränke ausgenommen Biere). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:46 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC34868 - In re Elijah J. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
See points [2.5] and [2(b)] of the reasons and the order, respectively. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
Matter of C-J-H prevents that person from readjusting their status, in conjunction with a waiver of inadmissibility under INA section 209(c). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:07 am by Rob Robinson
The idea of using DISCO’s generative AI tool as a way of responding to complex legal questions in plain English is very exciting, and we’re eager to test it out. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:47 am
The court agreed with the courts, including the court in In re Musselman, ___ B.R. ___, 2007 W 4357161 (Bankr.E.D.N.C., Nov. 30, 2007) and In re Kolb, 366 B.R. 802, (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2007) and held that the term "projected disposable income" as used in section 1325(b)(1)(B) and the term "disposable income" as defined in section 1325(b)(2) have the same meaning as to above-median income debtor. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The court terminated respondent-mother’s parental rights to all four children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (g), (j), and (k)(iii), and terminated respondent-father’s parental rights to his three children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (g), and (j). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the applicant cannot derive any claims if this communication is either not sent (see J 12/84) or not sent to the correct addressee. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There is a 102(b) rejection over the Wakai reference. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:50 am
On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly found that she had failed to rehabilitate within the meaning of General Statutes § 17a-112 (j) (3) (B) (i). [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:13 am
(Lief, J.), the debtor filed for chapter 13 relief in Texas. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As no response was received, the request for re-establishment was refused on October 30, 2009. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(b) A 90(1) provides that the EPO shall examine, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations to the EPC, whether the application satisfies the requirements for the accordance of a date of filing. [read post]