Search for: "In Re May"
Results 61 - 80
of 164,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 8:49 am
Re & Christopher M. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 2:50 pm
The CAFC made short work of "In re Zhang. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:24 am
The statute may be found here. [read post]
17 May 2009, 10:50 pm
We will re-open on Tuesday, May 19, 2009. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:24 pm
In other situations, it may not be so obvious who’s at fault. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:50 pm
While understandable reactions, the reality (provided it is appreciated) may be much simpler: a proper understanding and resulting application of the patent term adjustment statute. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 10:56 am
See In re Nomiya, 509 F.2d 566, 571 (CCPA 1975). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 7:03 am
A recent case illustrates how the court applies a res ipsa loquitur analysis. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
May 2, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Volcano Produce, Inc., Serial No. 86321169 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of GOLDENBERRY for "fresh fruits"].May 2, 2017 -2 PM: In re Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC, Serial Nos. 85179591 and 85179618 [refusal to register the mark shown below, in color and in black-and-white, for "restaurant services and restaurant carry-out services," without a disclaimer of LOBSTER].May 4, 2017 -2 PM: Advanced… [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 2:15 pm
[i] The case of In re Rankin, however, may be the most head shaking. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:38 am
” WLR Daily, 21st May 2008 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
In Re: Tableware Antitrust Litigation (No. 04-3514 VRW, N.D. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 12:30 am
The appeal was dismissed.Take home messageThis case is a reminder that it is not just the EP representative that may be held to high standards of care in battles for re-establishment. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:58 pm
But assuming a res judicata problem, it seems that the plaintiffs may have waived it. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
The post Sixth Circuit re-affirms substantive due process claims may go forward in Flint water cases. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
In re D.A. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:56 pm
Nazareth, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, June 21, 2015 “On May 13, 2015, the SEC published proposed amendments and re-proposed rules on the application of certain Title VII requirements to cross-border security-based swap activities of non-U.S. persons based on U.S. conduct. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:54 pm
The opinion should be available at this link: In re Tobacco II Cases, ___ Cal.4th ___ (May 18, 2009) These are the issues on review in the case: (1) In order to bring a class action under Unfair Competition Law (Bus. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:42 pm
Otherwise naming your Living Trust as a beneficiary may have dire tax consequences to your beneficiaries if it remains held in your Living Trust when you die. [read post]
