Search for: "In Re Pacer Technology"
Results 61 - 80
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 5:32 am
The new commercial module is an important achievement in leveraging technologies such as machine learning and natural language processing to identify, code and expose important new subsets of litigation which have been buried in the arcane coding of federal Pacer system. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Here’s the suppression-hearing transcript, which I have obtained from PACER. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:51 am
See how other leading attorneys have approached the same issue you’re tackling right now—within seconds. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2006); In re Bush (Pa. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:31 am
We all know that fees are paid when you’re prosecuting a case and judgments include court costs. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:40 pm
Why do I have a feeling we’re not getting the whole story here? [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:26 pm
With advances in technology, courts are now making documents attached to case dockets directly available online; and, that’s the case with Massachusetts, too, where courts are pushing more and more case-related documents (including decisions) to MassCourts.org (if you maintain a federal practice, think of it as PACER for Massachusetts). [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:44 am
Or the joys of PACER, which was ten years behind the technological times on the day it opened for business. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
(citing 104 USPQ2d at 1333 (quoting In re Pacer Technology, 338 F.3d 1348, 67 USPQ2d 1629, 1631 (Fed. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:33 am
Digitization and the Internet changed that, but even today most federal court documents live behind a government paywall known as PACER. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:40 am
Fees get plowed back to the courts to finance technology, but the system runs a budget surplus of some $150 million, according to recent court reports. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
The only changes from the version published in the subcommittee’s agenda book were: (1) a new sentence in Note for Rule 26(b)(1) encouraging computer search technology (that is to say, predictive coding), and (2) modifying the Note for Rule 37(e) concerning the role of prejudice in subsection (e)(2). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
For example, while most federal court documents are available online, they live behind a government paywall (the PACER system). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am
The defendant went through in its brief (Document 46 on PACER) and listed the major ways in which the technological characteristics of the device in question differed from the two predicate devices as to which plaintiff sought discovery. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
With regard to patent data solution providers specifically, there are a number of tools that re-code/re-index data from the various global patent offices. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
With regard to patent data solution providers specifically, there are a number of tools that re-code/re-index data from the various global patent offices. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
Among them are ideas for adding oral argument audio, case briefs, and data from PACER. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Excuse #4: “Congress said that we’re allowed to spend PACER funds on other things” This is false. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:50 pm
If you’re reading this blog, you probably already know about PACER and efforts underway to eliminate the paywall. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
I see his earlier work in the the PACER case as an example of Swartz's ability to layer technology upon law to generate techno-legal loopholes that allowed him to achieve his ends while not committing a crime. [read post]
