Search for: "In Re Roger T., et al." Results 61 - 80 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce, et al. , an 8-page opinion, Sr. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Benham’s article, Dirty Secrets: The First Amendment in Protective-Order Litigation, was cited in the following article: Craig Smith et al., Finding A Balance Between Securing Confidentiality and Preserving Court Transparency: A Re-Visit of Rule 76A and its Application to Unfiled Discovery, 69 SMU L. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) BPAI: Removing terminal disclaimers by patent reissue: Ex parte Shunpei Yamazaki (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Equitable intervening rights: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
[et al.].Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International ; Frederick, MD : Sold and distributed in North, Central and South America by Aspen Publishers, c2008.Intellectual PropertyK3850 .N58 2010Competition law, technology transfer and the TRIPS agreement : implications for developing countries / Tú Thanh Nguy?? [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm by Chris Castle
Other relevant reading should include Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al (2012). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Rees, et al., 217 S.W.3d 307 (Ky. 2006).........7 Brown v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Lucent's licensing expert, Roger Smith, argued for damages based solely on a running royalty rate. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]