Search for: "In Re Welfare Of E. D." Results 61 - 80 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 11:49 am by Daniel E. Cummins
If you're going to submit depo testimony, submit the entire transcript. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am by Aaron L. Nielson
In In re Dolly Varden Chocolate Co., decided in 1924, the Court reiterated that “the words ‘Merrie Christmas’ [do] not to constitute a valid technical trade-mark for ribbon. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
Let's look at the latest news jurisdiction by jurisdiction:Brazilian antitrust authority CADE grants unconditional clearance in decision that stresses three times that the task at hand is to protect consumer welfare and the competitive process, not individual competitors (i.e., Sony and Google)U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
Sections 651-669, or otherwise known as Title IV-D, Title IV-A, Title IV-E, or Non IV-D which leaves most details up to the states, but mandates certain things states must do. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Jennifer Davis
Protection du mineur et liberté d’expression sur Internet: étude comparée des droits français et américain à l’aune du droit européen et international. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:04 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Suppose a soda tax is borne mainly by poorer people but improves their welfare, because they reduce their consumption of unhealthy glop. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:09 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Factors that may outweigh the welfare of the child in a particular case were rights based considerations such as those contained in Article 8 (2) in particular the prevention of disorder or crime or the protection of the health and rights of others. e. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
So we’d not see a war if a U.S. state seceded. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Schwaegler’s February 1, 2011 operative report describes the procedure performed on that date as an “[e]xceptionally difficult L5-S1 reexploration, with re-do decompression, including excision large reherniation . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:25 pm by Russell Knight
” 735 ILCS 5/2-408(e) And the court will determine if the intervention will be allowed. [read post]