Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action."
Results 61 - 80
of 922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
Only a reasonably large statistical sample would yield meaningful results, given that a disagreement between two peer reviewers is not as instructive as a decision by an appellate body (where the appellant will challenge particular errors as opposed to a second review taking place without the benefit of an appeal that raises particular issues). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
Mezie explains that after rightsholders struggled to enforce their rights against peer-to-peer platforms, they turned their attention to individual end-users. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Swift J found that a new appeal would simple re-run arguments which had already been made. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:02 pm
Then, when appropriate and supported by peer-reviewed scientific evaluations, they require additional labels or removal from the market. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
Boutros,** and I*** have forthcoming in the Texas Law Review Online Edition. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:54 pm
As a matter of fact, the importance of these workplace pregnancy discrimination issues is further re-enforced by the federal Pregnant Worker Fairness Act (PWFA), which becomes effective next month. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
I also quickly concluded that my peers and editors knew almost nothing. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:49 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:42 am
Reviewing your KPIs during your campaign allows you to make adjustments to your tactics. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 1:24 am
The only significant change concerning the register is that SEP holders are now in a better position to get a peer review if they disagree with the initial essentiality check. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm
But they’re not. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
In a previous Lawfare article, I explained that a balanced approach is vitally important as the Department of Defense moves forward with implementing the recently published Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan (CHMR-AP). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
Jeff, welcome to The Geek in Review. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Videos reviewed by Slate show that a student leader of the protests then asked the audience to stay silent so Duncan could talk. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
Recital 28 says: "Unless a SEP is the subject of a peer review, there will be no further review of the essentiality check results. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:57 am
So Nicole, welcome back to The Geek in Review. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:50 am
(Re)starting? [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
A report from that balloon flight and a prior failed one is now under review at a scientific journal. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:21 pm
Lest there be any question, this is a big deal because a peer reviewed 2020 study cited approvingly by the EPA describes 99.7% of Americans having detectable PFAS in their blood! [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:04 pm
., Civil Action No. 19-cv-8110) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process. [read post]
