Search for: "In re: Proportionality Review Project"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
.: “I would dismiss the appeal … In sum, in respect of both the mental health and the after-the-fact evidence, I see no reviewable errors in the jury charge and, on these points, I would adopt the majority reasons of van Rensburg J.A. as my own, without reserve. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
If I am then I agree with Mr Dean that the court has to conduct a pure, fact-specific Re S balancing exercise. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
DSA says you have to take care of human rights in proportionate manner in moderation/filtering. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Experts generally work on an hourly basis, but many will take on discrete projects for flat fees. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
On appeal, Tapia raised three claims: (1) the Physical Solution violates California water rights priorities because it allocates portions of the NSY to the public water suppliers (“PWS”) while denying Tapia his claimed allocation of that NSY; (2) the Physical Solution is inequitable because overlying owners with demonstrable existing pumping were allocated proportionate shares of the remaining NSY while Tapia, despite similarly showing existing pumping, did not receive a… [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:55 pm
The EJ movement’s primary goal is to lessen the proportionate burdens on low-income and minority communities from human-created environmental risks. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:02 pm
” AFNU – Aix-en-Provence releases tothis end a call for papers.You will find below a brief description of this research project as well as a timetable forcontributors.Details of the research project“Information is power, and economic information is economic power. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:42 pm
Is it because they don’t want to wait for the data to be reprocessed or re-loaded into review platforms? [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Introduction: Rebecca TushnetApologies for not doing a great job answering these questions directly; I found myself thinking about the analogical project rather than diving into the details. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Now this stage of the process is over, Soul Survivor Watford has commissioned an independent review to be led by Fiona Scolding KC. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
There is a post about the report on the LSE Media Policy Project blog by its author Anri van der Spuy. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am
And any attempt to review the Draft Rules, as suggested in rule 2, will require a funded research project of the sort previously carried out by Dr Sandra Frisby in order to measure returns to creditors. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
”; quoting In re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:49 am
The first round: 2011 – 2015 In July 2011, the environmental NGO ClientEarth brought judicial review proceedings challenging the government’s then Air Quality Plans. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm
As well as being necessary and proportionate state intervention has to be authorised by law. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
Law Commission projects The Law Commission has in train several projects that have the potential to affect online activity. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
See In re Proportionality Review Project (II), 165 N.J. 206, 757 A.2d 168 (2000) (noting that bivariate analyses of race and capital sentences were confounded by missing important variables). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
