Search for: "In re Applied Materials, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 2,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 6:11 am
Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:15 am
In re Cray, Inc., the Federal Circuit applied the recent Supreme Court’s TC Heartland decision to grant a writ of mandamus, directing the Eastern District of Texas to transfer Raytheon’s patent case to a proper venue. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:41 am
Cococare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 11:46 pm
Sean Hao of the Honolulu Advertiser has an article that begins:Honolulu-based Oceanit Laboratories Inc. is looking to patent a nanotechnology concrete mix that creates stronger material for use in buildings, bridges and roads.The article notes:Oceanit has applied for a $500,000 federal research and development grant to develop the technology in coordination with state and county transportation officials. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:46 am
Schwabe North America, Inc., --- F.3d ----, No. 17-55261, 2018 WL 6786616 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 7:57 pm
Am., Inc., 924 F.3d 1243, 1252 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:04 am
[Refusal of PARTNERSHIP DANCING "educational and entertainment services, namely, conducting classes, workshops and events in the field of dance and distribution of course materials in connection therewith, and education consulting related thereto"].In re Avant Garde Marketing Solutions, Inc., Serial No. 77735279 (March 19, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
” In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig., 703 F.3d 511, 519 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 12:55 pm
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY - FIRE LOSS - MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION IN APPLICATION - RESCISSION - WAIVER - ESTOPPEL - TIMELINESS OF DENIAL Precision Auto Accessories, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp reiterated that the First Amendment "provides special protections for anonymity on the Internet," and argued that the court should apply the Dendrite test. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp reiterated that the First Amendment "provides special protections for anonymity on the Internet," and argued that the court should apply the Dendrite test. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
In In re Century Aluminum Co. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:49 am
Cir. 2004); see also In re Gulack, 703 F.2d1381, 1385 (Fed. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
This post examines how the 8th Circuit applied the heightened pleading standard under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ("PSLRA") in the case of In re Ceridian Corp. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The issue came up in In re Alstom SA Securities Litigation, 2010 U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:19 am
In re Powermat Inc., Serial Nos. 77715011 and 77715052 (January 17, 2013) [not precedential].Evidentiary issues: the Board first addressed certain problems with Applicant Powermat's evidence. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:21 am
Similarly, here the additional evidence was admittedly available when the prior application was pending, and so it did not constitute a material change of circumstances that would justify not applying res judicata. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
RE/MAX FIRST CHOICE, LLC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
