Search for: "In re B. S."
Results 61 - 80
of 28,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 7:27 pm
Florida Attorney Roddy B. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:12 am
On 27 August 2011, IPBiz had posted on the inter partes re-examination sought by Gevo as to the '188 patent of Butamax[See Gevo's inter partes re-exam request as to US 7,851,188 ]. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 5:39 pm
As you may recall, back in October, Randall Hull of The Br@nd Ranch® wrote about the Brinks Home Security re-brand to Broadview Security, in his post Will Any Old B-Word Do? [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:08 am
The trustees managing seven trusts executed by Martin B. in 1969, filed request that the Surrogate’s Court, New York County provide direction on distribution of trust assets to post-conceived children of Martin B. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
At which Robert has earned a B+ and B- grade point average, respectively.If you're able to graduate from college -- and fairly good ones, at that -- and are still unable to support yourself, that says something. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:51 am
In re Aries Marine Corp. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 3:47 pm
That’s why these immigrant’s visas are referred to as H1-B. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:00 am
In In re BP p.l.c. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 pm
The BPAI’s focus on the intended use of the composition missed the mark. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
Morally — you’re on your own. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:45 pm
Yes, it's Latin, and it is an affirmative defense that may thwart a (second) lawsuit. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:02 pm
But this attack on Prop B is not only unfair and undemocratic, it’s also based on faulty assumptions. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:43 pm
It was a year of product launches, re-brands and realignments. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:36 am
(b)(1).) [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 9:59 pm
Patent Nos. 6,656,702 ("Yugawa A") and 6,059,946 ("Yugawa B"). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
§ 1400(b). [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
October 18, 2007)(Schneider, J.) dismissed the debtor's chapter 7 case as an "abuse" under section 707(b)(1) based on the "totality of the circumstances" test of section 707(b)(3). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
See Black’s Law Dictionary 1423 (9th ed. 2009). [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm
[2019] EWHC 3357 (Ch) (12 Dec 2019) This was an appeal from the decision of the hearing officer, Mr Mark King, to revoke British trade marks 1495166 and 1495167 pursuant to s.46 (1) (a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994: [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:48 pm
"Re-reading Iqbal (a new take on the 12(b)(6) wars)": At the "Concurring Opinions" blog, law professor Jaya Ramji-Nogales has published this post written by law professor Adam N. [read post]
