Search for: "In re David B. (1979)" Results 61 - 72 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Writing in the Stanford Law Review, another professor, David Engel, [2] precisely articulated the standards to which corporations would need to subscribe in order to legitimate this unregulated power within a democratic society: Disclose fully the impact of their operations on society Obey the law Restrain their impact on government– both elections and administration Today, we are surrounded by the wreckage of this seemingly noble experiment. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Modern Age 19th century * 1830: William Huskisson, statesman and financier, was crushed to death by the world’s first mechanically powered passenger train (Stephenson’s Rocket), at its public opening. * 1834: David Douglas, Scottish botanist, fell into a pit trap accompanied by a bull. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm by Douglas
Como movimento governamental destinado unicamente a combater os criminosos e seus crimes, a adoção pelo Estado da nova criminologia administrativa importou a adoção de medidas legislativas e executivas, tais como: a) Substituição dos tipos de dano por tipos de perigo abstrato, incriminando a mera exposição do bem tutelado a risco potencial; b) Incriminação dos atos preparatórios e até mesmo da… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm by Douglas
Como movimento governamental destinado unicamente a combater os criminosos e seus crimes, a adoção pelo Estado da nova criminologia administrativa importou a adoção de medidas legislativas e executivas, tais como: a) Substituição dos tipos de dano por tipos de perigo abstrato, incriminando a mera exposição do bem tutelado a risco potencial; b) Incriminação dos atos preparatórios e até mesmo da… [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
(AMI)’s former CEO David Pecker, and others to influence the election by “identifying and purchasing negative information” about Trump “to suppress its publication and benefit” his “electoral prospects. [read post]