Search for: "In re Frances K." Results 61 - 80 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Une première consultation est ouverte jusqu'au 20.01.2012, qui concerne un projet de future R.53(3) CBE. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Privacy International is bringing up the rear with its own complaints against data brokers, ad tech companies, and credit referencing agencies in the UK, Ireland and France. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 7:45 am
" On K modification: "If I buy a house in Longmont, do you get to give me one in Boulder? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision is not surprising at all but it presents us with a nice application of the “suitable for ... [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
" In re Stanley Brothers Social Enterprises, LLC, 2020 USPQ2d 10658 (TTAB 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
In both principle and theory, at least in France, the answer is "yes". [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:53 pm by Ritika Singh
Dear Readers: You’re all stuck with me for the next week and a half while Raffaela takes a bit of a break. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 2 February 2016, the European Court of Human Rights decided that a self-regulatory body (Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete, MTE) and an Internet news portal (Index.hu Zrt) were not liable for the offensive comments posted by their readers on their respective websites. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:40 am by Guangjian Tu
In the field of international civil and commercial litigation, parallel proceeding issue is always subject to domestic civil procedure rules or principles like lis pendens, res judicata and forum non-convenience, while the problem may be complicated when arbitration proceeding is involved. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
Re (a): [2.2.1] In decision T 587/98, which concerns double patenting arising from a divisional application, the board concluded that A 125 was not applicable, as prohibition of conflicting claims would be a’ matter of substantive law rather than a matter of procedure (see [3.6] of the reasons). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:54 pm by Falk Metzler
For further coverage please refer to Oliver Randl's great K's Law blog and the EPLAW blog. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Reference is made, for example, to the Code of Civil Procedure of Germany (§ 705, Zivilprozessordnung), of France (Article 500, Code de Procédure Civile) and of Austria (§ 411, Zivilprozessordnung); for Switzerland reference is made to Vogel/Spühler, Grundriss des Zivilprozessrechts, 8. [read post]