Search for: "In re Julie M. (1999)" Results 61 - 80 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
July 6, 2009) (unpublished, in table at 899 N.Y.S.2d 58). [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
Under certain circumstances, I'm not against the use of private contractors for specialized corrections services, but these arguments far overstate privatization's benefits and encourage lawmakers to see private prisons as a way to do things on the cheap.UPDATE: An alert reader points me to this July 2003 study comparing publicly operated and private juvenile corrections facilities. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:19 am by Jonathan Bailey
On December 6, 1999, a consortium of 18 different record labels filed their lawsuit against Napster in a case that is goes by the name A&M Music v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 8:27 am by admin
.], a political scientist at Virginia Tech who has studied NGOs in Haiti [And who, more importantly, worked at the UN for a decade, with two stints in Haiti, in 1995 and 1999 – Ed.] [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 9:08 am
I am saying that old content should not be edited out of existence, which I have said previously in this magazine (see my July 1999 nothing.but.net). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Bexis
Oct. 7, 2009) (“[m]erely alleging that [defendant] marketed the drugs at issue for off-label purposes does not state a claim for fraud”); In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 Because FSIS focuses its enforcement actions (actually RE-actions) almost exclusively at the downstream DESTINATION facilities, instead of at the source slaughter providers. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
Initially, they're required to appear every week in court. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Rev. 985, 987 n.2 (1999); Julie Turner, Note, The Nonmanufacturing Patent Owner: Toward a Theory of Efficient Infringement, 86 Cal. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Corway v Independent Newspapers [1999] 4 IR 485, [2000] 1 ILRM 426, [1999] IESC 5 (30 July 1999) (noted here), the Supreme Court held that there was no clear statutory definition of blasphemy to give effect to this provision. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I’m dubious of the court’s reasoning here. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
In July of 1999, I was a first quarter law student at Baylor University in Waco, Texas. [read post]