Search for: "In re L.J., Jr."
Results 61 - 75
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 9:03 am
“If anyone thinks the antitrust case hasn’t slowed us down, you’re wrong. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
O’Driscoll, Jr. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
O’Driscoll, Jr. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
O’Driscoll, Jr. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
O’Driscoll, Jr. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
In re Conservatorship of Turner, No. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Law students enrolled in a "substantive" criminal procedure course frequently sweat over the intricacies of search and seizure law within contexts familiar to the average land-lubber attorney - the home, the automobile, and the person strolling down the street. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Galligan, Jr., Admiralty in Nutshell, 194-99 (5th ed. 2005) 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
