Search for: "In re L.J.-1 and L.J.-2" Results 61 - 80 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
In short, we're thinking about "preemption lite. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:26 am
Tex. 2006) (hereafter "Rosenthal SD Tex. 2006 Opinion"); In re Application of the United States for an Order (1) Authorizing Installation of a Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device and (2) Authorizing Release of Subscriber and Other Information, 2007 WL 3036849 (SD Tex. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., No. 86-1197, slip op. at 2-7 (3d Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 389-90 (1969).[2] Section 317 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
  [1]  In this case, the National Football League (NFL) is arguing that its teams operate as a single-entity and therefore cannot be held in violation of anti-trust laws. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 8:16 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Prior to 1952, the Reissue Statute text only allowed for (1) narrowing claim scope and (2) fixing a “defective or insufficient” specification. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Justification (1) very much depends on public understanding. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:33 pm
Section 1 of the chapter provides the context, situating labor rights from conceptions of social rights to rights embedded within the broad spectrum of human rights. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]