Search for: "In re Magnuson"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In re iPhone 4S Consumer Litigation, 2013 WL 3829653, (N.D. [read post]
30 May 2013, 1:34 pm
In re Scotts EZ Seed Litigation, 2013 WL 2303727 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
21 May 2013, 6:46 am
It didn’t have occasion to resolve which, if any, of NI’s representations fit the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act’s definition of “written warranty. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So even if plaintiff’s amended complaint survives, targeted discovery might establish, yet again, that plaintiff’s claims are preempted.It’s early, and we’re pretty sure we haven’t seen the last of this litigation. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:34 pm
Ed Markey (D-MA.) on Wednesday re-introduced a new, bipartisan version of a previously-introduced bill to combat widespread seafood fraud “that cheats fishermen and consumers, while posing health risks to pregnant mothers and others,” according to Markey. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
The Magnuson-Moss Act claim also failed because the “natural source” claim wasn’t a warranty against a product defect. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:25 am
First, as to the organic labeling claims, In re Aurora Dairy Corp. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:11 am
Magnuson fits this example on the state level (though his lawyering skills also are beyond repute). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:42 am
Plaintiffs sued under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the usual California claims, and common-law fraud. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:42 am
In re Viagra Products Liab. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
They’re preempted by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Taking Stock: The Magnuson-Stevens Act Revisited. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Plaintiff alleged breach of implied and express warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA), 15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq., and breach of contract and unconscionability under California law. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
Trawling for meaning: a new standard for “best scientific information available” in the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation Act. 60 Cath. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
-------------------------Photos: Above, James Oxley; lower, Bernadene Magnuson. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 6:59 pm
Relying on Tobacco II and In re Steroid Hormone Product Cases, the Court noted that “relief under the UCL is available without individualized proof of deception, reliance and injury. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
In re Sony Grand WEGA KDF-E A10/A20 Series Rear Projection HDTV Television Litigation, 2010 WL 4892114 (S.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
In In re Sony Frand Wega KDF-E A 10/A20 Series Rear Projection HDTV Television Litigation, Lead Case No. 08-CV-2276-IEG (WVG), Slip op. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
Allowing state law to impose a different standard permits a re-balancing of those considerations. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
In re Medtronic, Inc., 593 F. [read post]
