Search for: "In re McGee"
Results 61 - 80
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
Craftily Teacher’s Semi-Racy Facebook Photo Doesn’t Justify Firing – In re Laraine Cook Do Employers Really Tread a Minefield When Firing Employees for Facebook Gaffes? [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
They're not very good at policing their own, Mark Bennett's on-point blog screeds notwithstanding. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
McGee Police Officers Lean on School to Fire Social Worker for Facebook Post–and May Have Violated First Amendment Police Officer’s Facebook Venting Isn’t Protected By The First Amendment–Gresham v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 5:51 am
McGee and social worker Ms. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
E. coli O157:H7 was identified for the first time at the CDC in 1975, but it was not until seven years later, in 1982, that E. coli O157:H7 was conclusively determined to be a cause of enteric disease. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
” The Board of Trustees met the next month and the Chancellor re-affirmed that she would not be recommending Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
At the very least, the driver is going to have some hard questions to answer, because a lot of people here got hurt, and they’re going to want to know why. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
One of our readers sent us that brief (a publicly filed document) and asked us to comment.So we will, but we’re not identifying either the case or the plaintiff’s lawyer – if you’re reading, you know who you are.To us, the plaintiff’s proposition is, in one word, absurd. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm
It saddens me that you're allowed anywhere near unformed minds. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
(They’re probably on par with email disclaimers as far as legal efficacy.) [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
McGee, where a social worker’s social media rant allegedly “permanently compromised” her future credibility as a witness in court. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:36 am
McGee v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
In re Michael, 699 F.3d 305 (3rd Cir. 2012). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
[From an employee's perspective, if you're going to complain, don't do it about your customers; kvetch about your boss instead?] [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:33 pm
McGee on the D.C. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
McGee ("Although this undermines [defendant's] argument, a finding that AA requires confidentiality is not necessary to our holding. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:41 am
McGee [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
