Search for: "In re N.V." Results 61 - 80 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2014, 3:46 am
In re Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Serial No. 85092079 (September 26, 2014) [precedential]As we know, product configurations cannot be inherently distinctive. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:08 am by Lindsay Griffiths
For our latest interview, we chose another  of our newest ILN members, Jan Leo de Hoop of our member firm,PlasBossinade Advocaten N.V. in the Netherlands! [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Picanol N.V., 358 F.3d 1356, 1363(Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:19 am by John L. Welch
Applicant argued that the doctrine of foreign equivalents should not be applied here because the Examining Attorney failed to show that Italian is "a language familiar to an appreciable segment of American consumers," relying on In re Spirits Int’l, N.V., 563 F.3d 1347, 90 USPQ2d 1489 (Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:14 pm
Plant Genetic Sys., N.V. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:23 pm by Clif Burns
ABOVE: ING Headquarters On June 12, 2012, ING Bank N.V. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:14 am by Mike Scarcella
The facts as compiled in the statement of the Department of Justice describe a very different ING than the company we’re all working so hard for today. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
C5 refers to an e-mail from Mr de Vries to Mr Mooij, sent unencrypted on 25 January 2000 at 21:44, as certified in a notarial record dated 31 January 2000 at the request of DSM N.V. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:10 am by Mike Scarcella
“We're talking about less than one percent of the asserted claim. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this case a request for re-establishment of rights had been filed but the Board decided that this request was superfluous. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:38 pm by John L. Welch
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., 98 USPQ2d 1558 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]