Search for: "In re Render"
Results 61 - 80
of 9,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 5:31 am
"[Defendant] maintains that this factor is irrelevant under [In re Seagate 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2008, 6:46 am
A story today in the New York Times by Adam Liptak focuses on electoral selection of judges in the US, and mentions this interesting if predictable tidbit ("Rendering justice with one eye on re-election," May 25):A working paper from the University of Chicago Law School last year tried to quantify the relative quality of elected and appointed judges in state high courts in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:39 pm
Patent and Trademark Office rendered its final decision on Monday in one of the re-examinations of the Thomson stem cell patents provoked by two groups: the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT), headed by Dan Ravicher, and The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR),... [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:00 pm
In re Estate of Thompson, 2014 Ark. 237, 434 S.W.3d 877, 38 U. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:39 pm
Patent and Trademark Office rendered its final decision on Monday in one of the re-examinations of the Thomson stem cell patents provoked by two groups: the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT), headed by Dan Ravicher, and The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR),... [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:30 pm
The Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District, recently affirmed a foreclosure judgment rendered in favor of a mortgagee over claims by the homeowners that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata as a result of a prior foreclosure action wherein summary judgment was entered in the homeowners’ favor. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:39 am
§ 102 also renders the claim unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
Ilyse Wolens Schuman On April 14, 2015 the Employee Benefits Security Administration unveiled its proposal to re-define who is rendered a "fiduciary" of an employee benefit plan under ERISA by providing investment advice to a plan or its participants or beneficiaries.read more [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, where the established case law states that a removal order that is subsequently rendered invalid cannot serve as the basis for a federal re-entry conviction. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the Respondent's determination, contending that the ALJ was precluded from rendering a decision under the doctrines of res judicataand collateral estoppel and that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the Respondent's determination, contending that the ALJ was precluded from rendering a decision under the doctrines of res judicataand collateral estoppel and that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the Respondent's determination, contending that the ALJ was precluded from rendering a decision under the doctrines of res judicataand collateral estoppel and that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the Respondent's determination, contending that the ALJ was precluded from rendering a decision under the doctrines of res judicataand collateral estoppel and that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
In re: Atheros Communications: Disclosure Relating to Financial Advisor Fees and Analyses From Kevin Miller of Alston & Bird, a member of our Advisory Board: On March 4th, the Delaware Chancery Court (VC Noble) issued an injunction prohibiting Atheros from holding a meeting of its stockholders to vote upon a merger agreement with Qualcomm pursuant to which Atheros would be acquired by Qualcomm for $3.1 billion in cash in In re: Atheros Communications. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
What must one prove for a prenuptial agreement to be enforced in Tennessee? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:33 am
Union presses an appeal notwithstanding its concession that a final administrative determination rendered the appeal mootIn re Civil Service Technical Guild, Local 375, AFSCME, v The City of New York, et al, 58 AD3d 581New York State Supreme Court Justice Carol R. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:47 pm
Some days you're receiving congratulations to your opposing counsel following a jury verdict, and some days you're on the extending side. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 10:11 am
On obviousness from Ex parte MENNINGERSee also In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1550, (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Visit [howappealing.law.com] to view a district court order condemning a pleading as prolix and requiring the plaintiff to replead.Catching many readers' attention is the limerick by the judge at the end of the opinion:Plaintiff has a great deal to say,But it seems he skipped Rule 8(a),His Complaint is too long,Which renders it wrong,Please re-write and re-file today.Also notable was the fact that the complaint was 465 pages long, with the title of the racketeering… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
The doctrine became an exception to the general prohibition of hearsay evidence, rendering admissible out-of-court statements connected to an act because they were necessary in order to understand the events and had an inherent guarantee of trustworthiness. [read post]
