Search for: "In re SCHOOL DIST. NO. 60." Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOL WD Washington 2013http://t.co/G8Fxvm9iGD -> Patent war gives rise to niche industry of patent litigation http://t.co/vBawrZR3k7 -> Facebook sued over accusations it scans users’ private messages and shares the data with advertisers http://t.co/o5KvQf1Inn -> MPAA's Steve Frabizio on Google's Failures, Suing Kim Dotcom and Obama After SOPA http://t.co/Nzg9QVwb5k -> Is It Software? [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
., Science on the Witness Stand:  Evaluating Scientific Evidence in Law, Adjudication, and Policy 57, 60 (OEM Press 2001)(“A relative risk greater than 2.0 produces an attributable risk (sometimes called attributable risk percent10) or an attributable fraction that exceeds 50%. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Group, LLC v Bethpage Union Free School Dist., 39 AD3d 792, 796; Rosenthal v Allstate Ins. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
This article discusses the Marsh Law Firm's pioneering work to secure criminal restitution for our client Amy. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
But some of you who didn't go to law school may wonder what goes on inside the heads of Judges. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
(3) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the second degree if serious bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) while: (a) on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property; (b) driving through a school… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
An unpredictable and open-ended penalty upon research and innovation in the development of new products, especially prescription drugs.What happened in Conte is that the Plaintiff - like some 60% of all current users of prescription drugs - took a generic drug in accordance with her physician's prescription. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
County of Madera (5th Dist. 2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1099 - Here, the appellate court evaluated an EIR for an aggregate mining development. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Of course, whether reliance and causation are elements of a UCL claim is an unresolved question that the Supreme Court is expected to address in In re Tobacco and Pfizer. [read post]