Search for: "In re Telecommunications, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 5:11 pm
But we’re looking for corroboration — like the corroboration that my firm is not the only one to get the bogus “invoice.” We’re also going to be watching for other people telling stories of the sort of long-term lulling we’ll-pay-today-I’ll-be-there-in-an-hour behavior described here. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 2:14 pm
Stripe, Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Crouser and Associates, Inc., Opposition No. 91167709 [Section 2(d) opposition to the mark shown below for various goods and services related to printing, based upon Opposer's prior use of the mark CERTIFIED PRINTERS for copying and printing services.]October 14, 2008 - 2 PM: In re Houston Shutters, LLC, Serial No. 78896946 [Section 2(d) refusal to register ROCKWOOD for shutters and blinds in view of the registered mark ROCK WOOD for furniture, wholesale distribution of… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:25 am
Cablecom Tax Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
In Google Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:34 pm
Madisonian.net reports on In re Erving Industries, Inc., a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
Soc'y, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
On July 5, 2011, Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.May 3, 2012 - 11 AM: In re InterDesign, Inc., Serial No. 77906060 [Refusal to register FRIDGE BINZ! [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
Wyeth, Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00325, U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald this week issued an injunction against Seattle-based ivi, Inc., preventing the Internet company from streaming programming of New York and Seattle television stations to its subscribers online and to mobile phones.In the copyright infringement action, WPIX, Inc. et al. v. ivi, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
SamsungIn these consolidated appeals, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications Ameri- ca, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) challenge orders of the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, 2014 WL 3610789, at *7 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:10 pm
Arnaud), Execulink Telecom, and Primus Telecommunications. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
In re Lemco Gypsum, Inc., 911 F.2d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.1990). [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 12:15 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCommunicationsCourt Decides It Has Jurisdiction to Hear Dispute Between Interrelated Telecommunications Firms Verizon New York Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:30 am
January 20, 2010 - 2 PM: In re F.X. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
But you’re thinking, I thought this blog was about CAFA…and Gary Coleman…WE WANT CAFA!!! [read post]
