Search for: "In re the Dependency of: J. P." Results 61 - 80 of 563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 8:52 am by Persuasion Strategies
   ____________________ Other Posts on Intent:  Get Inside the Black Box of "Intent:" A Note on the Tarek Mehanna Trial Don't Be Defined By Bad Acts (Make Your Good ActsIntentional, and Your Good Intentions Actual) Don't Wear The Black Hat Lightly: You're Not the Bad Guy Because You're at Fault, You're at Fault Because You're the Bad Guy ____________________ Mueller, P.; Solan, L.; Darley,… [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 7:27 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you’re wondering whether you can claim wardrobe expenses or whether to deduct a capital loss, you won’t want to miss it. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 8:11 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is for Pease Limitations… [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:34 pm
S., at 363.Petitioner makes an alternative argument that does not depend on tolling. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 9:29 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is for Pease Limitations… [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 11:27 pm
  They're not people who waste time questioning why they're doing what they're doing. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by David Doniger
EPA is not required to re-prove the existence of the atom every time it approaches a scientific question. [read post]