Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa."
Results 61 - 80
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
If the full appellate court affirms, the Supreme Court may well grant cert and determine this issue because the Ninth Circuit decision is directly at odds with a First Circuit ruling involving an identical Massachusetts law. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in New Prime v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 224 N.J. 189 (N.J. 2016) (insurer was not required to show that it suffered prejudice before disclaiming coverage on basis of the insured’s failure to give timely notice). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
Pa. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court's cases rendered those statutes unconstitutionally overbroad. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
Beck Supreme Court decision. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
The report attributes the decline in the number of state court lawsuits to the March 2020 decision in Salzberg v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds Artful Pleading to Avoid Liability ExclusionIn Erie Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
Nicholas Ranjan of the Pennsylvania Western Federal District Court held that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In her Opinion, Federal District Magistrate Judge ruled that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
” An appeal to the California Supreme Court is likely. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
Pa. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Gibbons v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
The insurance company denied the claim based, in part, on the application of a Household Exclusion in the policy.The carrier argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Geico, 32 A.3d 1195, 1209 (Pa. 2011), in which it was held by the then Pennsylvania Supreme Court nine years ago that the regular use exclusion was not void as against public policy.Notably, the court in this case also made a point to emphasize that the current Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s separate decision with respect to the household exclusion in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:04 pm
He found that the importance of the directors’ attention to the company’s “mission critical” regulatory issues is outlined in the Delaware Supreme Court’s Marchand v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
The Supreme Court split, however, on what the appropriate standard for assessing the existence of a duty, vel non, in maritime law, where the federal courts must act as common law courts in developing legal rules and principles. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:59 am
In a decision handed down yesterday the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a one-line Order denying a petition for allowance of appeal filed by an insurance company from the Superior Court’s decision in the case of Kline v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:17 pm
Geico, 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019) for support.After reviewing the applicable law, including recent Pennsylvania federal court decisions upholding the validity of the Regular Use Exclusion even after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down its decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
Regardless, the court noted that the regular use exclusion had been previously upheld by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s holding in the case of Williams v. [read post]
