Search for: "J.M.3." Results 61 - 80 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
Discussion Jody James and the Agency disagree about (1) whether the Agency is liable for Jody James's loss; (2) whether they agreed to arbitrate the merits of that issue; and (3) whether the trial court or the arbitrator should decide whether they agreed to arbitrate the merits. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : J.M. c. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm by Schachtman
The Ambrosini case straddled the Supreme Court’s 1993 Daubert decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by MOTP
To establish their right to judgment as a matter of law on their affirmative defense of res judicata, the Howells had to establish (1) a prior final judgment on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; (2) identity of parties or those in privity with them; and (3) a subsequent action based on the same claims as were or could have been raised in the first action. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
May a payday lender enforce arbitration clause after wrongfully filing bad-check affidavits and procuring criminal prosecution of borrowers in aid of collecting civil debt when debtors turn the tables on them and sue? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
” [3] As one noted expert observed, summarizing the history of these bacteria and their significance for public health: Although L. monocytogenes was recognized as an animal pathogen over 80 years ago, the first outbreak confirming an indirect transmission from animals to humans was reported only in 1983, in Canada’s Maritime provinces. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
There are other items which some have identified as “fake news”:  poorly sourced and shoddy journalism; outright fraudulent stories submitted as journalism (see Janet Cooke and Jayson Blair, among other examples),[3] and knowingly or negligently false statements by politicians and their supporters. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:02 am by Jeremy Saland
According to the New York Penal Law, you are guilty of NY PL 215.50(3) if you intentionally disobey a lawful mandate of a court. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:02 am by Jeremy Saland
According to the New York Penal Law, you are guilty of NY PL 215.50(3) if you intentionally disobey a lawful mandate of a court. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:08 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The court did not directly deal with the public policy issue, but it did say: “Indeed, J.M. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:58 am by Quinta Jurecic
 The appointment will be for a period of up to 3 years, which may be extended. [read post]