Search for: "JAMES R. ANDERSON"
Results 61 - 80
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2020, 10:02 am
The committee will hear testimony from James Anderson, the acting undersecretary of defense for policy, and Lt. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Wes Henricksen Henricksen Barry Torts Health Law Environmental Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont … [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:01 pm
Lammens in Anderson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
” Margaret Taylor sat down with Scott R. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 12:26 pm
” James M. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:32 am
bid=10267913 LAW LIBRARY level 3: KE1402 .N38 2019Hartley R. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Inquiring minds wonder how the peer review committee ever became so unbalanced, but I suspect that asymmetrical evaluation of conflicts of interest had a lot to do with it.[5] [1] James Hanley, Corbett McDonald, and Margaret R. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
” In a different open letter, Waitrose executive director James Bailey said it would never sell, under the supermarket’s own label, hormone-treated beef. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
University of Pittsburgh School of Law—James Anderson, Director, Justice Policy Program; Director, RAND Institute for Civil Justice; Senior Behavioral Scientist; Faculty, Pardee RAND graduate School, presents today, his paper, Blaming and Claiming Behavior Among the Injured and Ill and Its Implications for Tort, as part of the Faculty Workshop Series. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
• Arthur R. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
Last week, Lawfare senior editor Scott R. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Robert R. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Robert R. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm
Dey (2019) _______ CA4th _______ "In this case, we must determine whether James Robert Anderson, settlor and trustee of the James Robert Anderson Revocable Trust (the trust), validly amended the trust when he made handwritten interlineations to one of the operative trust documents, specifically the First Amendment to the trust (First Amendment), making Grey Dey a beneficiary. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Boffey, Rory Thomson, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Kenneth Rose, Emma Cross, Will Anderson, Mitchell Abbott, Felicity Bramall and Jennifer Love, all from CMS. 16:01: Lady Hale thanks the parties for the swiftness of their submissions and notes that the Court will adjourn until 10.30am tomorrow. 16:00: Lord Keen QC rests his submissions. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont Máiréad Enright marieadenright Birmingham (UK) Law & Religion… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:22 am
James F. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:37 pm
By James Korenchan, Michael Anderson, and Yukio Oishi -- Patent practitioners who focus their practice in the high-tech sector have most likely encountered Japanese patent law in one form or another. [read post]