Search for: "JONES v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS"
Results 61 - 80
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
His office prosecuted four men who are currently on death row as well as two executed this year. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Ramirez and Jones, closed the federal courthouse doors to evidence of ineffective assistance of trial counsel — attorney errors that prevented juries from hearing evidence of innocence — that was not first presented to the state courts due to the incompetency of state post-conviction counsel. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Oklahoma state law provides that “if a vacancy or irrevocable resignation occurs in the office of a member of the United States Senate from Oklahoma” the state must hold a special election to fill the empty or to-be-empty seat. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Jones, a recent case involving such a private suit, the “high respect that is owed to the office of the Chief Executive * * * should inform the conduct of the entire proceeding, including the timing and scope of discovery. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:38 am
In a 99-page opinion, the panel said it had the power to review the case despite claims from the United States Attorney General’s office and the Department of Homeland Security that the DACA rescission order was beyond judicial review. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
" Jones v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Jones . . . .Paula Jones filed a lawsuit against Bill Clinton on May 6, 1994, some sixteen months after he had become President of the United States. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
The individual goes to arraignment without an attorney. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
United States, 51 F.4th 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 2022))). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
Jones, an 1872 decision by the United States Supreme Court that, among other irrelevant observations (called "obiter dicta", or "things said beside the point"), offered the view that the then-established Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America was hierarchical. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Gore, Citizens United, the State of the Union address, or a confirmation hearing. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Jenkins's office. [read post]
