Search for: "JUDITH J. SEES"
Results 61 - 80
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2017, 8:32 am
Wax Steven Willis Todd J, Zywicki [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm
The published judgment explaining Keehan J’s decision (that AOL News don’t link to) is here. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Neuwelt, J. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
See also @pierremoscovici. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Robin J. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:54 am
See a crack in the wall? [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:29 am
On this point, I'd want to see some empirical data on domestic systems, to see which of them do and which of them do not offer this already. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:23 pm
See Wis. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:14 am
Judith J. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am
Judith J. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:56 am
See Judith Apter Klinghoffer & Lois Elks, “The Petticoat Electors”: Women’s Suffrage in New Jersey, 1776–1807, 12 J. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
This point has been repeated in a number of cases decided since the decision of Dingemans J (see for example De La Flor Cabrera v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:03 am
Mian and J. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
You are unlikely to see it relied on too much in the future. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
If so, then Feeney J should not have reversed that award. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
(See Steve’s Georgetown piece here and Geoff Corn and Chris Jenks’ response here.) [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
See, e.g., Etienne Weisskopf, Celine J. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:06 pm
J-Setting comes from historically black colleges with a marching band and auxilliary section in the front with the moves: gay men reproducing feminine movements: Prancing J-Settes. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:05 am
[Abstract]; Reply by Michael J. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
See 17 C.F.R. [read post]
