Search for: "Jaffe v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 4:37 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Krupski v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Their approach centers on the idea that Marvel and Disney intellectual properties, especially characters, compete for the attention of the same market. [ 14 ] Several of these analysts point out that Disney has repeatedly tried and failed to capture the young male market share with their characters, especially in the television and film realms, but succeeded with young women. [ 15 ] These analysts point to Marvel’s strong hold on young males and weakness towards female in the comic book… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Max Sheppard Mullin New York TMax@sheppardmullin.com and Amanda Jaffe   [1] Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:08 pm
Jaffe, a professor at the University of Western Ontario in London. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:24 am
Jaffe, P.C. talks about the recent opinions handed down by the United States Supreme Court on March 5th. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
If the examination standards in the United States were not changing, we might expect successful applications in the United States by US inventors to grow at about the same rate as our measure of internationally important inventions originating in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:51 pm
Last week, this cert. petition (with appendix) was filed in the case of Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Section 1498(a) further provides that whenever a patented invention "is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof . . . the owner's remedy shall be by action against the United States in the [CFC] for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use or manufacture. [read post]