Search for: "John Doe I v. John Doe II" Results 61 - 80 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
In my last unreasonably long post, I discussed the case of Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
The length of time that Enbridge Northern Gateway’s oil tankers and pipelines proposal has managed to stay afloat –despite widespread opposition and the lack of any firm commercial contracts for use of its pipelines –once prompted my colleagues here at West Coast Environmental Law to ask, as John Cleese does in the famous Monty Python sketch, whether the Enbridge project was dead or merely resting. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
”) Notably, the majority in Fisher II highlights the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Sweatt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
The 12th Amendment does not require a winning candidate to receive a majority of the Electoral votes that are in theory available (538). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
.; Texas Corral Restaurant II, Inc.; T.C. of Michigan City, Inc.; T.C. of Kalamazoo, Inc.; Chicago Roadhouse Concepts, LLC; Paul Switzer; Victor Spina; and John Doe Corp. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 3:04 am by Broc Romanek
After discussing my Top 5, I explain why Halliburton II does not make the list. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
,[i] the Eighth Circuit interpreted and applied the Supreme Court’s decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
In other words, the Department of Commerce does not have the sort of rulemaking power that the EPA was given in the Clean Air Act and that was expressly exercised in writing the regulations sustained in Chevron. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:02 pm by Steve Lubet
(Spiro Agnew also resigned by letter to Kissinger, but I don't think anyone would look to Agnew as a constitutional authority; I don’t know how John C. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
  The opinion notes that (i) “A.R. admitted to taking and emailing the picture to her friend”; and (ii) “[i]t was alleged that several of the recipients of the email (which included the photograph) were under the age of 17. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
The President does (Nixon v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am by SHG
Chief Justice John Roberts asked a question during oral argument in Fisher II that offended many. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:12 am by Jack Goldsmith
I noted last week than in his answer to the question whether the Obama administration could “carry out drone strikes inside the United States,” John Brennan gave this non-response: “This Administration has not carried out drone strikes inside the United States and has no intention of doing so. [read post]