Search for: "John v. Russo" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action “exists where a party to a contract receives bills or invoices and does not protest within a reasonable time” (Russo v Heller, 80 AD3d 531, 532 (1st Dept 2011] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), or where partial payment has been made (see Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
A day after publication began, Attorney General John N. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Magid was a significant step forward from prior appellate law on the subject of deadlock under Section 63, the most recent of which, Seligson v Russo, 16 AD3d 253 [1st Dept 2005], involved true “50-50 deadlock. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
In Sobol v Les Pieds Nickels, Inc., the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the lower court’s denial of the respondent shareholder’s request for permission to file an untimely election made eight years after the dissolution proceeding’s commencement. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am by William Ford
Carol Saivetz examined Russo-Turkish rapprochement, arguing that it remains a stretch to call the countries “friends. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
His discussion of Utah's trade secret statute, and the availability of unjust enrichment damages, comprises only part of his opinion for the 10th Circuit in Russo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]