Search for: "Johnson v. Arnold"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 7:06 am
In a March 6, 2015 decision in Levien v Johnson, NYLJ 1202721296511, at *1 (Sur Ct, New York County), the New York County Surrogate’s Court enjoined the trustees of a testamentary trust from proceeding in Texas to challenge the adoptions of two adults, Parvin Johnson, Jr. and Kenneth Ives, by the grandsons of the Decedent, Arnold Levien. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
This one too is masterminded by Alan Johnson and Alexandria Palamountain.* Failure! [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
The case is Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), yet another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v… [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:05 pm
" These "negative" forces include predicted secondary market "chaos" resulting from the Washington Square v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
The same principle has been applied to applications to amend under section 75 of the 1977 Act: see Sara Lee Household & Body Care UK v Johnson Wax Ltd [2001] FSR 17 and DataCard Corp v Eagle Technologies Ltd [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat) at [226].105. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
On the same day there will be an application in the case of Johnson v Hampshire NHS Trust. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:39 am
V. [read post]
