Search for: "Johnson v. Civil Service Board" Results 61 - 80 of 248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Civil Justice Council commissioned an independent review into remote hearings during the Covid-19 to gather feedback on the impact of coronavirus measures on the civil justice system. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
President Lyndon Johnson nominated Weinstein in January 1967, and he was confirmed three months later. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Data Protection Board had a news piece on the “Sixteenth EDPB Plenary Session”. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
“I am concerned that the Arthrex court’s remedy of removing civil service protections for administrative patent judges means that there may not be enough transparency into when political pressure may have affected a case, to say nothing of being unfair to the civil servants who signed up for a different position than they now have,” Johnson said.The Federal Circuit panel said its ruling only applies to cases where litigants have presented an… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats File Lawsuit to Enforce Subpoena Against McGahn The Hill – Olivia Beavers, Jacqueline Thomsen, and Morgan Chalfant | Published: 8/7/2019 House Judiciary Committee Chairperson Jerrold Nadler filed a civil lawsuit to enforce a subpoena for testimony from Don McGahn, the former White House counsel who at the Trump administration’s direction defied lawmakers’ request to appear before the committee. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
Johnson had protection by the federal marshal’s service for twenty years. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* The terms of the CBA continue in effect following the expiration of its term because the parties have not yet entered into a successor agreement (see Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Patouhas v Patouhas, 2019 WL 2202430 (2d Dept.,2019) plaintiff commenced an action for a divorce on March 1, 2016, by service of a summons with notice upon the defendant. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
He was a member of the Board of Directors of the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. [read post]