Search for: "Judge Plager"
Results 61 - 80
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2012, 1:07 pm
Jim Pfander (Northwestern) entitled Why Judges Leave the Bench. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:38 am
Judges Mayer, Plager, Clevenger, Schall, and Linn continue to serve the court as judges with senior status. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A panel of three federal circuit judges, Judges Newman, Plager, and Wallach, upheld a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("Board") in an inter partes reexamination rejecting certain claims of U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:55 am
The decision is rather unremarkable in its holding, yet, the “additional view” opinions of Judges Plager and Newman emphasize a growing frustration in the precedent relative to the level of deference to be accorded USPTO claim constructions. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:23 pm
" Judge Plager: [V]arious of our cases seem to apply one or the other of two (possibly three) inconsistent standards, mostly without acknowledging that the other standard exists. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:53 pm
Judge Linn wrote the majority opinion that was joined by Judge O'Malley. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
Jay Plager, Circuit Judge, U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:32 pm
In a case denying re-hearing in a case involving lodestar calculations, Judge Dyk and Judge Plager both have additional comments. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
And Judge Plager's argument is vindicated. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:32 am
Judges Robert Mayer, Jay Plager, Raymond Clevenger, and Anthony Schall also continue to serve on the court in senior status. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
Jay Plager (U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
Two are noteworthy: Judge Dyk wrote four of the dissents on claim construction, while four separate judges (Bryson, Moore, Plager and Mayer) wrote the dissents on the issue of subject matter patentability. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:48 am
Jay Plager (CA-FC), and Gregory Ablavsky (Penn.) bring some preliminary data to bear on this issue, including on factors that motivate judicial retirements. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:02 am
The panel majority, over a strong dissent by Judge Plager, (1) adopted an improper proportionality standard requiring the reduction of fees when calculating the lodestar, and (2) set unworkable standards for seeking reimbursement for out-of-town counsel’s fees, despite controlling law requiring that fee awards be sufficient to attract competent counsel. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:28 pm
Jay Plager and William C. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
" (Majority opinion by Judges Lourie and Plager). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
The majority of the panel, which consisted of Federal Circuit Judges S. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
The majority of the panel, which consisted of Federal Circuit Judges S. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
“The majority opinion here – penned by Judge Plager and joined by Judge Newman – argues that courts should avoid the metaphysical question of whether an invention is unpatentably abstract whenever possible and instead focus on the conditions of patentability found in §§ 102, 103, and 112 of the patent act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
“The majority opinion here – penned by Judge Plager and joined by Judge Newman – argues that courts should avoid the metaphysical question of whether an invention is unpatentably abstract whenever possible and instead focus on the conditions of patentability found in §§ 102, 103, and 112 of the patent act. [read post]
