Search for: "K & R Service Co., Inc. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Higgins, and Douglas K. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:21 pm
Kurz v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
R. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:17 pm
In the case of AVT, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Miller, and Medical Marketing Resources SE, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Co. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
BE&K Construction Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
