Search for: "K Hoffman"
Results 61 - 80
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
Paparelli Partner, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP Thomas K. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:26 am
Paparelli, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP Thomas K. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:21 am
Kimberly Bennett, Founder, K Bennett Law LLC. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 1:46 pm
LEGAL EDUCATION Brandon K. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
By Kay K. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
McCloud, as second vice president; Ashlei Gradney, of Gradney, as secretary/treasurer; and Immediate Past President Michael K. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 3:30 am
Paparelli Partner, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP Thomas K. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:45 am
Paparelli Partner, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP Thomas K. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:00 am
Williams Intellectual Property**Kenneth DorsneyRichard K. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
The UCL debate on the UK Supreme Court decision Actavis v Eli Lilly ("Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Taly Dvorkis of A&O enters into the debate, examining the differences in US and UK law, and queries whether it is linked to inventor evidence: The inventor Kat taking centre stage"At the November UCL debate "Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top fifty regulatory essays of 2017 authored by outside contributors. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top fifty regulatory essays of 2017 authored by outside contributors. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
“That leads to me at home later tonight hating myself, asking, ‘Why the f–k didn’t I say something? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:17 am
Hoffman, and Ryan J. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
In: Hoffman, B.T. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
In: Hoffman, B.T. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
In: Hoffman, B.T. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
In: Hoffman, B.T. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
What you get for writing the conference report - an elephantThorsten Bausch (Patent Attorney, Hoffman Eitle, Munich, Germany) reiterated that Germany does not have a concept of closest prior art, but the Bundesgerichtshof demands that the starting point for inventive step analysis must be justified (BGH, 16 December 2008 - X ZR 89/07 – “Olanzapine”). [read post]
