Search for: "Kelly v. Consolidated" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Going forward, plaintiffs may only pursue in state court their WPA claims alleging retaliation for reporting criminal misconduct such as fraud and embezzlement, state courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over those claims (Henry v Laborers’ Local 1191 dba Road Construction Laborers of Michigan Local 1191, May 5, 2014, Kelly, M). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners)   Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO adorably" and ADIORABLE:… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Judges Kelly and Montgomery both wrote separate partial concurring and dissenting opinions (Faidley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Weinstein, Individual Justice in Mass Tort Litigation: The Effect of Class Actions, Consolidations, and other Multi-Party Devices 117 (1995) (“A court should not coerce independent eminent scientists, such as the late Dr. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
Here is how Judge Weinstein described the event: “But what I did may have been even worse [than Judge Kelly’s conduct that led to his disqualification]. [read post]