Search for: "Kennedy v. State Bar (1989)"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
So, too, in 1989 the Court appointed John Roberts, currently the Chief Justice, as amicus to defend the judgment below in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
The process that the Court uses to decide whether to make one of its criminal law rulings retroactive, to closed cases, dates from its 1989 ruling in Teague v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Galloway, 572 U.S. 565,), legislative prayer has become the vehicle for advancing a constitutionalization of history and tradition as a predicate to adjudging the legitimacy of religious practice in a number of other contexts (Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Some state statutes limited the coverage for workers’ compensation to diseases that manifested within a certain time window during and after employment. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
(For more on the current state of the doctrine, see this post.) [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:14 am
Kennedy - was whether that would be a meaningful inquiry that would in reality give youths' some chance of avoiding having the state give up on them entirely. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined, as to Parts I, II, and III. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:20 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court in Golan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 404 (1989). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Kennedy and issues director for Sen. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:46 am
The standard for competency at execution was set by Ford v Wainwright, a 1986 case in which the Supreme Court said that the Eighth Amendment’s bar against cruel and unusual punishment forbids execution of the “insane. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
(A draft article cowritten by Harvard Law School's Randall Kennedy lays out a wealth of evidence on this.[1]) Less than two weeks ago, the word was mentioned 52 times in the opinions in a Connecticut Supreme Court decision (State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:43 am
Hearing the case of Metrish v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Most tellingly, it would reverse Buckley v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
United States (1983), the Supreme Court rejected a university’s claim for a religious exemption from a federal rule that barred race discrimination by tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Lane (1989) and Coleman v. [read post]
