Search for: "Kitchen v. Kitchen" Results 61 - 80 of 1,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 12:34 pm by Lucy Trieshmann
The upcoming Supreme Court case Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Tahir v Aghri & Anor (claim for possession of residential premises) (2023) EW Misc 2 (CC) Another HHJ Luba KC judgment, this time in what started as a possession claim by a private landlord but went horribly wrong for him. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
Instant Brands is majority owned by a New York-based PE firm that engineered the 2019 merger with World Kitchen, the Pyrex and CorningWare company, which Cornell initially purchased in 2017. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
Instant Brands is majority owned by a New York-based PE firm that engineered the 2019 merger with World Kitchen, the Pyrex and CorningWare company, which Cornell initially purchased in 2017. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:24 am by Frank Cranmer
She refused to be vaccinated and was told that, in the circumstances, the care home “would like to continue offering you work however that would have to be on a redeployed basis, likely to the kitchen or laundry department” [16]. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:00 am by CAFE
 REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:Caroline Kitchener bylines  Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Counsel can choose to advance a kitchen sink of arguments, carefully choose a more limited set, or carelessly omit a potentially strong argument. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case holds that a factfinder may may determine that a restaurant at the Resorts World Casino had to notify employees that it was shutting down because it was sufficiently distinct from the Casino and therefore fell within the WARN Act.The case is Roberts v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
▫️V: The themes explored in the film touch on abuse. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm by Giles Peaker
This has had the serious consequence of effectively confining the claimant to the top floor, as it is very difficult for him to access the kitchen and living area. [read post]