Search for: "Knight v. Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2021, 5:07 am by Eugene Volokh
This week, we discuss that opinion and the potential broader impacts of this case—now known as Biden v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
With this in mind, the recent judgment of the US Supreme Court in the case of  Biden v Knight First Amendment Institute [pdf] has provided a  refreshing outlook at the issue, following important observation by Thomas J, that some digital platforms might need to be considered as a “common  carrier”, which could possibly mean that they would lose the Section 230 immunity and their sole discretion to withhold service to individual users. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
(Ed Kilgore, New York magazine) SCOTUS vacates Knight Foundation, Thomas has things to say (Howard Wasserman, PrawfsBlawg) In Terry v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
  Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, has already opined that “there is a strong likelihood that the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
  This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Ezra Rosser
ReevesChair, The Florida Board of Bar Examiners andPartner, Moseley Prichard Parrish Knight & Jones Kellye Y. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
branch of government [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on Cato amicus brief in Seila Law v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The ASA website had a news report “Consumers warned of Thomas Cook refund scams”. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]