Search for: "Laurent v. Laurent"
Results 61 - 80
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 9:42 am
” Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:16 am
In Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:19 pm
Yves Saint Laurent red sole trademark infringement case. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:50 pm
(credit for photo of Hollande at Sunday's commemoration © Présidence de la République-Pascal Segrette/Laurent Blevennec) [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 3:21 pm
Laurent, 2008 Colo. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:24 am
September 12, 2023 - 11 AM: Montgomery Law LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Yves Saint Laurent have been able to quantify the number of sales of the allegedly offending shoe. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Unlike some of the current members of the Patents Court, Henry is no stranger to intellectual property, a field in which he has practised since the 1980s: indeed, he is a fully-fledged member of the IP community and his exploits as a Deputy Judge have been recorded on a number of occasions on this weblog (see eg Healey v Jensen here, International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller of Patents here). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
The AmeriKat snuggly asleep moments before the IPKat wakens her with news of the Louboutin judgment The AmeriKat was fast asleep in bed just now when her BlackBerry started vibrating off her bedside table with news that the long awaited judgment from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent case has just been published. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
The applicant was represented by Me Laurent Hincker (Strasbourg). [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:35 pm
It’s Me, Section 421 Francesca Stefania Condello, & Laurent Ruessmann, The CJEU Judgment in Nokia and Philips Clarifies the Customs Detention of Goods Suspected of Infringing Intellectual Property RightsBrian Facey, Prakash Narayanan, & Cliff Sosnow, Promises Are Meant to Be Kept: A Case Comment on Attorney General of Canada v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:22 am
See Jean-Laurent v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:28 pm
Gucci's trademark lawyers presented even more ammunition explaining that Marc Fisher Footwear received four cease and desist letters in 2008 from Coach, Adidas, Jimmy Choo, and Yves Saint Laurent accusing Fisher of infringing on designs. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was said, in the important ruling in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent 29-30- that:‘We conclude, based on the record before us, that Louboutin has not established secondary meaning in an application of a red sole to a red shoe, but only where the red sole contrasts with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
In Shabazz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Yves Sain Laurent Am., Inc. [read post]
