Search for: "Leathers v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 4:25 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
On September 16, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit published its long-awaited decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:50 am
Trek Leather. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 am
United States Steel Corp., issued earlier this year. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
On March 5, 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to constitute an en banc panel to reconsider a decision issued by the court in Trek Leather Inc. et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:02 pm
By Dennis Crouch US v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
Co., Ltd., 254 NY 111, 114 [1930]) and six months (Continental Leather Co. v Liverpool, Brazil & Riv. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office does not register trademarks it considers aesthetically functional. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
United States, is another of those exasperating cases where a technicality prevents a judgment on the merits. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:05 am
See Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm
So, let's get started.Do you remember United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:04 am
Authored by Steve Shardonofsky Earlier this year, we commented [here] that the Supreme Court agreed to review the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Sandifer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 3:05 pm
This legislation is remarkable in light of all the uproar over the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]