Search for: "Lewis v. Constitution Life Co." Results 61 - 80 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am by Ronald Collins
            Question: In many respects, this is an inside account of the struggle to preserve and perpetuate New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
 In a later essay published in The New York Review of Books, he explained that, “Arbitrariness in the imposition of the death penalty is exactly the type of thing the Constitution prohibits, as Justice Lewis Powell, Justice Potter Stewart, and I explained in our joint opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Meyer, Co-Chairs of the Research Forum; and Ingrid Wuerth of Vanderbilt University Law School and Midyear Meeting Host Committee member Harlan Cohen of Georgia Law, who will serve as inaugural Co-Chairs of the Society's new regional project, ASIL-Southeast. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by Susan F. Mandiberg
Introduction On Monday, March 19, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
For example, for our purposes, what constitutes a book? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
March 2011 It emerged during that case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police, that the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) and its chairman paid £20,000 to lawyer Mark Lewis in settlement of his libel claim arising out of comments made by Baroness Buscombe. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.13 The Court reaffirmed this truism in Ashcroft v. [read post]