Search for: "Lewis v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm
” The Superior Court concurred with the lower court that Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
If compensating injured parties was the sole purpose of constitutional tort law, the rationale would best be effectuated through a remedial regime akin to what Justice Lewis Powell referred to as strict liability in Owens v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Studen-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan has held that the US Government cannot take over the defence of the libel claim against President Trump brought by E Jean Carroll. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
Superior Court, 697-702 Harper v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
More recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision in Barker v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:29 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
On 13 to 16 July 2020 the trial in the case of Nwakamma v Umeyor took place before HHJ Lewis. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
The case, Lewis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am
V. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am
V. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:17 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
