Search for: "Libertarian Party" Results 61 - 80 of 1,953
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Foolish judges are likely to make impractical demands are the lawyers and parties who appear before them. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
[Policy analyst Justin Hayes summarizes the reasons why conservatives, progressives, and libertarians all have reason to support zoning reform.] [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by Gabriel Greif
Consequently, cutting down the length of time for parties to prepare the record may lead to the exclusion of relevant documents. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
If we assume that the transaction has no external costs (harms to third parties), then allowing the transaction makes buyer and seller better off and hence is required by the weak Pareto principle. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:30 pm by Ilya Somin
This is a problem both major political parties, "national conservatives," and most left-liberals seem determined to ignore. 5. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
Or has the Court simply started to grapple with the inherent tensions between property rights and speech libertarianism, as it begins to chart out a new, perhaps less speech-protective, course? [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
These amendments would be held in place not by being written into a document for lawyers to interpret, but through the political power of the Republican Party. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
For example, capping candidate spending means little if parties/slates can spend an unlimited amount. [read post]
A deluge of amicus curiae briefs were filed from a broad swath of interest groups in favor of Hansen, including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the libertarian think-tank the Cato Institute and several immigration law organizations and scholars. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:35 am by Tom Smith
“We’ve had reports of journalists, political commentators, a domestic political party; these compliance violations are the most worrisome type of politically focused surveillance. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ilya Somin
A true contract arises through the voluntary agreement of the parties. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm by David Oscar Markus
Maybe Justice Jackson can invite Justice Gorsuch, an avid outdoorsman who presumably enjoys wilderness-y stuff, to a viewing party for Survivor, one of her favorite shows. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Most obviously, will there be an institution (or adjudicators) who will offer a decision that will be thought to “bind” the losing party? [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
This post, by Karen Tani (University of Pennsylvania), is the fifth in a series of posts in which legal historians reflect on Outside In: The Oral History of Guido Calabresi (Oxford University Press), by Norman I. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:09 am by George Croner
Nonetheless, Congress recognizes that “it is simply not possible to collect intelligence on the communications of a party of interest without also collecting information about the people with whom, and about whom, that party communicates, including in some cases, non-targeted U.S. persons. [read post]
13 May 2023, 2:11 pm by Ilya Somin
Decades of survey data show that most voters often don't know even such basic things as which party controls which house of Congress, which branches and levels of government are responsible for which policies, how the federal government spends its money, and much else. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:29 pm by Ilya Somin
These two organizations, one conservative/libertarian, the other liberal/progressive, reflect the divisions in our larger society as well as our two-party system of politics. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
These two organizations, one conservative/libertarian, the other liberal/progressive, reflect the divisions in our larger society as well as our two-party system of politics. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
When some then criticized party orthodoxy or corruption, Mao had the speech retroactively changed and cracked down on dissenters as spreading harmful thoughts. [read post]